4 Counter-Intuitive Ideas from the Paper That Unleashed Modern AI

Hey folks! If you’ve interacted with an AI lately—chatbots, translation apps, image generators—you’ve witnessed something remarkable. Models that seem almost magical in their capabilities. But this isn’t magic. It all traces back to a single research paper from 2017: “Attention Is All You Need”.

This paper didn’t offer incremental improvements. It threw the rulebook out the window.

The authors proposed a new architecture called the Transformer, breaking away from the step-by-step approach that had guided the field for years. By questioning the very foundations of how machines should handle sequences like text, they unlocked performance and scale that nobody had seen before.

What fascinates me is that the core breakthroughs are built on a handful of powerful, counter-intuitive ideas. Let’s dig into them.

1. They Threw Out the Rulebook on Sequences

For years, the gold standard for handling sequential data was Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), with variants like LSTMs being particularly popular. The logic was intuitive: since we read and write language in order, word by word, our models should do the same. RNNs process a sentence step-by-step, maintaining a “memory” of what came before.

But this sequential approach had a massive bottleneck.

As the paper points out, its “inherently sequential nature precludes parallelization.” You can’t process the tenth word until you’ve finished with the ninth. This made training on massive datasets painfully slow and became a critical constraint for scaling to longer sequences.

The Transformer’s first radical move? Get rid of recurrence entirely.

Instead of a sequential chain, they proposed a model that could look at every word in a sentence at the same time using attention. This was a complete departure from established wisdom.

“In this work we propose the Transformer, a model architecture eschewing recurrence and instead relying entirely on an attention mechanism to draw global dependencies between input and output.”

Think about it: decades of research assumed sequential processing was the natural way to handle language. The Transformer said “nope” and processed everything in parallel.

2. They Solved Order Without Using Order

Here’s where it gets interesting.

By throwing out sequential processing, they created a seemingly fatal problem: how would the model know word order? Without step-by-step processing, the input becomes a “bag of words”—making “dog bites man” and “man bites dog” look identical.

Their solution was both clever and strange.

Instead of having the model learn order through its architecture, they injected position information directly into the data. They created “positional encodings”—unique vector signatures—and added them to each word’s embedding.

Even more surprisingly, they didn’t learn these positional addresses. They created them using a fixed mathematical formula based on sine and cosine waves of different frequencies. Each position in a sequence gets a unique “timing signal.”

Why this specific approach? The authors chose it because it “may allow the model to extrapolate to sequence lengths longer than the ones encountered during training.”

It’s like giving every word a GPS coordinate instead of reading them in order. Counterintuitive, but it works brilliantly.

3. They Gave the Model Multiple Perspectives

The engine at the heart of the Transformer is “attention”—a mechanism that weighs the importance of different words when processing a given word. But the authors didn’t stop at a single attention mechanism.

They introduced Multi-Head Attention.

Instead of having one attention mechanism analyze relationships in a sentence, why not have several do it at once, in parallel? Their base model used eight parallel attention “heads.”

Each head learns to focus on different types of relationships:

• One head might track grammatical links (which verb connects to which subject)
• Another might track semantic relationships (which words refer to the same concept)
• Yet another might focus on proximity or discourse structure

The paper explains:

“Multi-head attention allows the model to jointly attend to information from different representation subspaces at different positions. With a single attention head, averaging inhibits this.”

It’s like having a team of eight specialists look at a sentence simultaneously, each bringing their own expertise. The combined insights lead to far richer understanding than any single perspective could achieve.

4. The Results Were Immediate and Overwhelming

A revolutionary idea is one thing. Proving it works is another.

The Transformer didn’t offer slight improvements—it delivered a stunning leap forward.

On English-to-German translation (WMT 2014):

• New state-of-the-art: 28.4 BLEU score
• Beat the best previous models by more than 2.0 BLEU (a significant margin)

On English-to-French translation:

• New single-model state-of-the-art: 41.8 BLEU

But here’s the kicker—efficiency:

The paper notes their models achieved superior quality at “a small fraction of the training costs of the best models from the literature.” The new state-of-the-art trained in just 3.5 days on eight GPUs.

Furthermore, when tested on English constituency parsing—a completely different, structurally complex language task—the Transformer performed “surprisingly well,” outclassing models specifically tuned for that purpose.

The message was clear: this architecture wasn’t just better at translation. It was a fundamentally superior way to process language.

A New Foundation for Intelligence

The core concepts—parallel processing through attention, explicit positional information, and multi-faceted understanding via multiple heads—did more than build a better translation model.

They provided a completely new architectural foundation for AI.

By breaking free from sequential computation constraints, the paper enabled models to be trained on internet-scale data. GPT, BERT, T5, and every major language model since then is built on this foundation.

The revolution started with text, but the authors were already looking ahead. In their conclusion, they stated their plan to extend the Transformer to other modalities.

Today we see the fruits everywhere. Vision Transformers for images. Whisper for audio. Multimodal models that process text, images, and video together.

Now that attention has conquered text, what will it teach us to see next?

---

Want to discuss AI architectures or share your thoughts on Transformers? Find me on Twitter or LinkedIn.

Happy learning!